The Communication explains the background to the draft Interpretation.
The idea behind an Interpretation Ruling (which is provided for in the Financial Sector Regulation Act) is that the FSCA, through an Interpretation Ruling, promotes clarity, consistency, and certainty in the interpretation and application of financial sector laws, in this case, the Pension Funds Act.
The FSCA is required to issue a draft of the Interpretation Ruling and call for public comment.
Once an Interpretation Ruling is issued by the FSCA, it must then act in accordance with the Interpretation Ruling until such time, to paraphrase, as a court gives a different interpretation to the Interpretation Ruling or the particular provision of the legislation is done away with.
For some time there has been debate around whether or not section 37C applies to the lump sum death benefits of paid-up members and in what circumstances. We are referring to paid-up members as provided for in the default regulations. That is members that have left service of the employer but have not instructed the fund in writing as to payment or transfer of their benefit.
Some of this debate was centered on the conflicting wording of the FSCA and old Financial Services Board notes.
So, the question has arisen: if paid-up members die, must the fund payout lump sum death benefits in terms of section 37C or not? The rules of funds submitted to the FSCA for registration have differed in this regard.
The above applies whether or not the fund benefit is insured (by the policy of insurance) or not.
Funds will be allowed 6 (six) months from the date of the Interpretation Ruling (whenever it is published in final form) to ensure that their rules comply with the Interpretation Ruling.
Due to the draft Interpretation not being finalised as yet, the FSCA has given funds an extension for compliance with the preservation and portability default regulations (Regulation 38) until 29 February 2020. The extension appears to only apply to funds that have already submitted rule amendments to comply with the preservation and portability default regulations (Regulation 38). The wording of the extension is a bit confusing, but the above interpretation appears to be the intention.
This Cookie Policy explains how we use cookies and similar technologies on our website axioconsult.com. This policy is designed to help you understand what cookies are, how we use them, and the choices you have regarding their use.
Cookies are small text files that are stored on your device (computer, tablet, or mobile phone) when you visit certain websites. They are widely used to enhance your online experience by remembering your preferences and actions over time. Cookies are not harmful and do not contain personal information like your name or payment details.
We use cookies for various purposes, including:
You have the option to manage your cookie preferences. You can usually modify your browser settings to accept, reject, or delete cookies. Please note that if you choose to block or delete cookies, some features of our website may not function properly.
We may allow third-party service providers to use cookies on our website for the purposes outlined in Section 3. These providers may also collect information about your online activities over time and across different websites.
We may update this Cookie Policy from time to time to reflect changes in technology, law, or our data practices. Any changes will become effective when we post the revised policy on our website.
If you have any questions about our Cookie Policy or how we use cookies on our website, please contact us at
By continuing to use our website, you consent to the use of cookies as described in this Cookie Policy.